Monday, 28 May 2012

Women in Islam



Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh.

"Verily, all praise is due to Allah. It is due to Him, and to Him alone. We praise Him and we seek His help and forgiveness. We seek refuge in Allah from the evil of our own selves and from the evil of our actions. And whomsoever Allah guides, there is none to misguide him, and whomsoever Allah leads astray none can guide him aright. I testify that there is no god worthy of worship except Allah, alone with no partner, and I testify that Muhammad (SAWS) is His slave and messenger. Indeed the best speech is the book of Allah, and the best guidance is that of Muhammad (SAWS). The worst affairs are the newly invented matters, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Fire." 


As promised finally delivering women in Islam. The issues of gender equity is important, relevant, and current. Debates and writings on the subject are increasing and are diverse in their perspectives. The Islamic perspective on the least understood and most misrepresented by non-Muslims and some Muslims as well. This article is intended to provide a brief and authentic exposition of what Islam stands for in this regard.

Women in Ancient Civilisations:


One major objective of this article is to provide a fair evaluation of what Islam contributed toward the restoration of woman's dignity and rights. In order to achieve this objective, it may be useful to review briefly how women were treated in general in previous civilisations and religions, especially those which preceded Islam (before 610 AD).

Describing the status of the Indian woman, The Encyclopedia Britannica, 1911, states: "In India, subjection was a cardinal principle. Day and night must women be women be held by their protectors in a state of dependence says Manu. The rule of inheritance and agnatic, that is descent traced through males to the exclusion of females." In Hindu scriptures, the description of a good wife is as follows: "a woman whose mind, speech and body are kept in subjection, acquires high renown in this world, and, in the next, the same same abode with her husband."

In Athens, women were not better off than either the Indian or the Roman: "Athenian women were always minors, subject to some male - to their father, to their brother, or to some of their male kin." Her consent in marriage was not generally thought to be necessary and "she was obliged to submit to the wishes of her parents, and receive from them her husband and her lord, even though he were stranger to her."

A Roman wife was described by a historian as: "a babe, a minor, a ward, a person incapable of doing or acting anything according to her own individual taste, a person continually under the guardianship of her husband." If married she and her property passed into the power of her husband...the wife was the purchased property of her husband, and like a slave acquired only for his benefit.

In Britain, the right of married women to own property was not recognised until the late 19th Century. By a series of acts starting with the Married Women's Property Act in 1870, amended in 1882 and 1887, married women achieved the right to own property and to enter into contracts on a par with spinsters, widows, and divorcees. In France, it was not until 1938 that the French Law was amended so as to recognise the eligibility of women to contract. A married woman, however, was still required to secure her husband's permission before she could dispense with her private property.

In the Mosaic (Jewish) Law, the wife betrothed. Explaining this concept the Encyclopedia Biblica, 1902, states: "to betroth a wife to oneself meant simply to acquire possession of her by payment of the purchase money; the betrothed is a girl for whom the purchase money has been paid." From the legal point of view, the consent of the girl was not necessary for the validation of her marriage.The woman being man's property, his right to divorce her follows as a matter of course." The right to divorce was held only by man.

The position of the Christian Church until recent centuries seems to have been influenced by both the Mosaic Law and by the streams of thought that were dominant in its contemporary cultures. It would be hard to find anywhere a collection of more degrading references to the female sex than the early Church Fathers provide. Lecky, the famous historian, speaks of 'these fierce incentives which form so conspicuous and so grotesque a portion of the writing of the Fathers... woman was represented as the door of hell, as the mother of all human ills. She should be ashamed at the very thought that she is a woman. She should live in continual penance on account of the curses she has brought upon the world. She should be ashamed of her dress, for it is the memorial of her fall. She should be especially ashamed of her beauty, for it is the most potent instrument of the devil. One of the most scathing of these attacks on woman is that of Tertullian: 'Do you know that you are each an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age; the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway; you are the un-sealer of that forbidden tree; you are the first deserters of the divine law; you are she who persuades him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack.' Not only did the church affirm the inferior status of woman, it deprived her of legal rights she had previously enjoyed.

3 comments:

  1. Asalam alaikum. This comment may be abit misplaced, but here goes: I have been researching on whether using synthetic hair to braid is haram. What I have found so far based on almost all internet sites is that using human hair was explicitly prohibited by Prophet Muhamad (SAW), but that he (SAW) mentioned that using wool, or silk is accepted. Could you please clarify this if you have more insights?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Salam aleikum, so this is very interesting. So here goes.

    Firstly there is a unanimous agreement of sholars on the impermissiblity of the use of human hair to beautify the womans hair. There are two main reasons for that. The first is to imitate the kafirs and the second to deceive people about your hair. There are several hadeeths to support these reasons.

    If a woman wears hair extensions and adorns herself with it, even if she does this for her husband, she is imitating the kaafir women, which the Prophet (pbuh) forbade:

    It was narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar said: The Prophet (pbuh) said: “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 3512; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Irwa’ al-Ghaleel, 2691

    Women are forbidden to add extensions to their hair, whether they are made of hair or anything else, if they could be mistaken for hair, because of the reports that have been narrated concerning that.

    Narrated ‘Aisha (R.A):

    An Ansari girl was married and she became sick and all her hair fell out intending to provide her with false hair. They asked the Prophet(pbuh) who said, “Allah has cursed the lady who artificially lengthens (her or someone else’s) hair and also the one who gets her hair lengthened.” Volume 7, Book 72, Number 817: Sahih Bukhari

    The scholars based on this hadith have prophibited the use of another persons human hair of whatever source.

    Now to the issue of non human hair like wool , silk and cloth.

    There are have difference of opinion amongst the schools of thought.

    Hanafi and Shafi schools have allowed the use of wool and its kind because it is not human hair and not considered cheating. They have allowed it as it could beutify the woman for her husband.
    The Shafi school based their opinion on the condition that the source animal for the wool has to be pure as in halal to eat and also that the woman who does it is married with the permission of her husband.

    The maliki school prohibits the use of wool and other things that seem like hair and not apparently clear it is not the womans hair. They have only permitted the use of things like silk to tie the hair as it doesnt add to the hair but only used as an extention and fully apparent it is not her hair.

    The Hambali have toed a similar line of the malikis prohibiting anything that seems like human hair even if it is not human hair.

    From the explanation above we should not condemn anyone using wool to beautify herself as long as it is for her husband. The use of rubber will take the similar ruling of wool but the reason rubber will be sometimes impermissible is water will not penetrate rubber for the purpose of wudhu which makes the wudhu non valid. Wool could be penetrated by water so no issue with this.

    And God knows best.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the clarification. I think, whenever one is in doubt (due to the different schools of thoughts), it is best to steer away until one is sure.

    ReplyDelete